Board Thread:Series general discussion/@comment-2112031-20170802103944 - Revision history

Soranin: Text replacement - " " to " "

2026-07-09T22:36:03Z

Text replacement - " " to " "

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 10 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyptian Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/702509897976516608 statement] ~~made~~ by Aymar in 2016 in which he stated that Vol 1–6 were not considered canon.		The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyptian Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/702509897976516608 statement] made by Aymar in 2016 in which he stated that Vol 1–6 were not considered canon.

	However, although the events in modern day were indeed considered non-canon, the events set in the past were, in fact, considered canon. I personally find Aymar's statement to be too vague to come to the conclusion that none of it is considered canon anymore, especially since the question was whether the comics were considered canon in general.<ac_metadata title="AC French comics canon" related_topics="Assassin's Creed – Cycle 1"> </ac_metadata>		However, although the events in modern day were indeed considered non-canon, the events set in the past were, in fact, considered canon. I personally find Aymar's statement to be too vague to come to the conclusion that none of it is considered canon anymore, especially since the question was whether the comics were considered canon in general.<ac_metadata title="AC French comics canon" related_topics="Assassin's Creed – Cycle 1"> </ac_metadata>

imported>The Wikia Editor at 10:40, 2 August 2017

2017-08-02T10:40:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 2 August 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyptian Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/702509897976516608 statement] made by Aymar in 2016 in which he stated that Vol 1–6 were not considered canon.		The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyptian Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/702509897976516608 statement] made by Aymar in 2016 in which he stated that Vol 1–6 were not considered canon.

	However, although the events in modern day were indeed considered non-canon, the events set in the past were, in fact, considered canon. I personally find Aymar's statement to be too vague to come to the conclusion that none of it considered canon anymore, especially since the question was whether the comics were considered canon in general.<ac_metadata title="AC French comics canon" related_topics="Assassin's Creed – Cycle 1"> </ac_metadata>		However, although the events in modern day were indeed considered non-canon, the events set in the past were, in fact, considered canon. I personally find Aymar's statement to be too vague to come to the conclusion that none of it is considered canon anymore, especially since the question was whether the comics were considered canon in general.<ac_metadata title="AC French comics canon" related_topics="Assassin's Creed – Cycle 1"> </ac_metadata>

imported>The Wikia Editor at 10:40, 2 August 2017

2017-08-02T10:40:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 2 August 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the ~~Egyption~~ Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/702509897976516608 statement] made by Aymar in 2016 in which he stated that Vol 1–6 were not considered canon.		The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyptian Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/702509897976516608 statement] made by Aymar in 2016 in which he stated that Vol 1–6 were not considered canon.

	However, although the events in modern day were indeed considered non-canon, the events set in the past were, in fact, considered canon. I personally find Aymar's statement to be too vague to come to the conclusion that none of it considered canon anymore, especially since the question was whether the comics were considered canon in general.<ac_metadata title="AC French comics canon" related_topics="Assassin's Creed – Cycle 1"> </ac_metadata>		However, although the events in modern day were indeed considered non-canon, the events set in the past were, in fact, considered canon. I personally find Aymar's statement to be too vague to come to the conclusion that none of it considered canon anymore, especially since the question was whether the comics were considered canon in general.<ac_metadata title="AC French comics canon" related_topics="Assassin's Creed – Cycle 1"> </ac_metadata>

imported>The Wikia Editor: Created page with "The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyption Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/7025098..."

2017-08-02T10:39:44Z

Created page with "The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyption Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/7025098..."

Páàjì titun

The user Spanish assassin has recently removed information from the Egyption Rite article related to the French comics. He cited a [https://twitter.com/AymarMtl/status/702509897976516608 statement] made by Aymar in 2016 in which he stated that Vol 1–6 were not considered canon.

However, although the events in modern day were indeed considered non-canon, the events set in the past were, in fact, considered canon. I personally find Aymar's statement to be too vague to come to the conclusion that none of it considered canon anymore, especially since the question was whether the comics were considered canon in general.<ac_metadata title="AC French comics canon" related_topics="Assassin's Creed – Cycle 1"> </ac_metadata>