Editing Talk:Al Mualim

This person may be intended to be be Rashid ad-Din Sinan, leader of the Hashshashin from 1162 to 1192 and "Master of the Syrian assassins", which matches what is said in the game. Moreover, the time of his death roughly matches the one of Al Mualim's.






He is. If you play the mobile version of the game and take the time to read the slow-scrolling text about Altair, you will find that they say, "Sinan, Master of Assassins".

Why is there speculation about an Al Mualim / Warren Vidic connection? If that were the case, why not toss Vidic in the Animus in AC1 to read Al Mualim's memories of the Piece of Eden, and avoid the entire fiasco with Desmond?

:As you said, it's just a speculation. Maybe Abstergo didn't knew it. I too don't believe in it, since we would have lot of clues and conections throughout the games to such a important heritage. -- [[User:D. Cello|D. Cello]] 15:20, November 28, 2009 (UTC)


i think Warren was unable to use is own memories , because Al Mualim had a child sometime before the events of AC, so Warren would only have Al Mualim memories up until he has a child.
[[User:Adam2me|Adam2me]]00:06, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Does Al Muaim have his finger amputated?




Its quite obvious that Al Mualim is basically Rashid ad-Din Sinan. It makes sense that Rashid would go by a name like Al Mualim. Also, there is some resemblance between Al Mualim, Rodrigo Borgia and Warren Vidic. So its quite possible. But maybe the reason why Abstergo doesn't put Warren in the Animus is probably because they're afraid that their best scientist will lose his sanity in the Animus like Subject 16. Or also because they are unaware of Vidic's Lineage. Or maybe because Al Mualim's memories are only available till he has a son. Which would probably be well before the events of Assassin's Creed.

yes but as he is referred in the game as Al Mualim, why do we not refer to him like that above his profile picture?

== How Old is he? ==

Year of birth and age? 


[[Special:Contributions/196.25.255.246|196.25.255.246]] 14:06, March 28, 2010 (UTC)someone

The strategy guide states that he is in his 50s [[Altaïr|Altaïr]] 11:26 March 29,2010 (UTC)

== Eagle vision ==

When exactly can you see him in eagle visions? (except the end battle) Cause i wanna try it on him

[[Special:Contributions/109.129.81.221|[[User:EXistenZ!|EXistenZ!]] 15:58, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
]]



I don't think you ever can seeing as that would kinda give away the surprise at the end.

[[User:Lucan07|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><font color="blue">'''Admin'''</font><font color="red">'''Auditor(e)'''</font></span>]][[User talk:Lucan07|<sup><font color="black">''Talk''</font></sup>]] 21:08, January 2, 2011 (UTC)



No Apparently you can see him in eagle vision, but he turns up blue. I wanna know when in the game this is, cause i thought he only appeared in cutscenes [[User:EXistenZ!|EXistenZ!]] 08:29, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

== Al Mualim a Templar? ==

I did not find any convincing proof that he was a Templar after all, I think he just desired power for himself. The Templars are a powerful organization that all its members share a common goal for all of the organization's interests, one character showing himself as a "villain" does not mean he is a Templar. [[User:AltairTheFlyingOne|AltairTheFlyingOne]] 16:08, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

:[[Robert de Sable]]'s final words are quite convincing of the fact. Altaïr protested that Al Mualim was not a Templar, but Robert countered him, asking why Al Mualim knew so much of the Templars' actions. Robert also said that ''"The only difference between your master and I is that he did not want to share,"'' indicating their common allegiance. =[[User:GuardDog|GuardDog]] 16:33, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
:
:Alright then, pretty plausible, thanks! [[User:AltairTheFlyingOne|AltairTheFlyingOne]] 21:46, July 17, 2011 (UTC)