<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=12.25.9.2</id>
	<title>Assassin&#039;s Creed Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=12.25.9.2"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/12.25.9.2"/>
	<updated>2026-06-09T10:30:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeanne_d%27Arc&amp;diff=592255</id>
		<title>Talk:Jeanne d&#039;Arc</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeanne_d%27Arc&amp;diff=592255"/>
		<updated>2016-12-10T11:55:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;12.25.9.2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Naming==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this article should be named Joan of Arc - [[User:Duelisttri|Duelisttri]] 13:13, July 29, 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would make it easier to identify who it is, but her name wasn&#039;t originally Joan of Arc. [[User:A.J. two|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;A.&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[User talk:A.J. two|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;dimgray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/A.J. two|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;black &amp;quot;&amp;gt;two&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; 13:45, July 29, 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First of all, just because you think it should be named Joan of Arc doesn&#039;t mean it would. Give some arguments. And as I said before, AC tends to use the original language&#039;s names rather than the English ones (like Christoffa Corombo instead of Christopher Columbus). Therefore, I named the article like this. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 15:22, July 29, 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think so because in one of the glyphs, 16 stated Joan of Arc - [[User:Duelisttri|Duelisttri]] 15:25, July 29, 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course he would. He&#039;s American. I highly doubt he would say Jeanne d&#039;Arc. However, that is her real name. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 20:07, July 29, 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Callixtus = Templar?==&lt;br /&gt;
Pope Callixtus III burned Joan of Arc, they say that he is a part of the Borgia family. maybe considered as a templar, you could see him in the glyph of Joan of Arc with the templar symbol. should this be added in the wiki?=&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lucassassin|Lucassassin]] ([[User talk:Lucassassin|talk]]) 12:20, September 15, 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Another Piece of Eden==&lt;br /&gt;
So it&#039;s kind of obvious that Jeanne had to have come in contact with another PoE prior to the Sword and the Heart to be the catalyst for the Voices. Normally one would think a Shroud because the connection to Consus but that was just a supposition and nothing about a Shroud was ever alluded to. However they did make mention of a ring, possibly a Shard, which she received from her parents during her early teens, around the time she first came in contact with the Voices. Later she kept it in the satchel with the Heart which was given to Fluer when they switched places. That also explains why she never heard from the Voices after faking her death. If it was a Shard it like theShroud prototype could have had an Isu imprint on it. [[Special:Contributions/12.25.9.2|12.25.9.2]] 11:55, December 10, 2016 (UTC)Lacrossedeamon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>12.25.9.2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=Talk:Sword_of_Eden_1&amp;diff=600816</id>
		<title>Talk:Sword of Eden 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://assassinscreedwiki.accesstheanimus.com/index.php?title=Talk:Sword_of_Eden_1&amp;diff=600816"/>
		<updated>2016-12-10T11:40:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;12.25.9.2: /* Piece of Eden 25? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Multiple swords==&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a source stating that there are multiple swords? I don&#039;t see why Genghis Khan&#039;s sword and Germain&#039;s can&#039;t be the same weapon (difference in appearance can easily be attributed to artistic licence). --&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:34, November 10, 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Database: Reconstructed Data 003]], Consus specifically said &amp;quot;Swords&amp;quot;, it&#039;s the same one where he revealed the existance of multiple shrouds. [[User:The Wikia Editor|The Wikia Editor]] ([[User talk:The Wikia Editor|talk]]), 17:59, November 10, 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Until now, I assumed that the pictures displayed in AC: Memories had the same status that a screenshot of the main games, that they were a canon depiction of a precise and defined in-universe moment, that they weren&#039;t like a concept art, a non-canon artistic interpretation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, with such a discrepancy in design between the two known canon depiction of a sword of Eden, in my opinion it can safely be assumed that the two swords are not the same sword but different weapons. Moreover, Syndicate clearly states that Hephaestus and Consus created more than one sword... [[User:Maxattac|Maxattac]] ([[User talk:Maxattac|talk]]) 17:04, November 10, 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact there are multiple Swords and Staves was already stated in the very first edition of the Encyclopedia and this article has been named &amp;quot;Swords&amp;quot; ever since. However, I am not particularly satisfied with naming this &amp;quot;Sword of Eden 1&amp;quot;. Why is this Sword of Eden 1? Was it ever named as such? To my knowledge it wasn&#039;t. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 12:00, November 11, 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It just seemed appropriate to continue the naming policy used for the various Apples and Shrouds of Eden...[[User:Maxattac|Maxattac]] ([[User talk:Maxattac|talk]]) 12:23, November 11, 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The names for the Apples come from &#039;&#039;AC1&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;AC2&#039;&#039;. I&#039;m asking not because I&#039;m opposed to creating separate articles but because I just want to have some solid reasoning for the specific numbers. -- {{User:Master Sima Yi/sig}} 12:36, November 11, 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Although I&#039;m not entirely convinced we need separate articles for these particular PoEs, I do think that maintaining a consistent approach to number the Pieces, by simply following the precedent set with the Applies, is best.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I should point out that (despite the fact I created the article) [[Shroud of Eden 1]] and [[Shroud of Eden 2]] are never called as such, in fact the closest we get to an official name for either of those two is Shroud 1 being called a &amp;quot;prototype&amp;quot;. --&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[User:Jasca Ducato|Jasca Ducato]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Jasca Ducato|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jasca Ducato|contributions]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:25, November 11, 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Piece of Eden 25?==&lt;br /&gt;
Question: if this Sword is Piece of Eden 25, aka the sword Jeanne d&#039;Arc used in the Hundred Years&#039; War, doesn&#039;t that mean Jeanne somehow broke into the Temple, removed the Sword and then, years later, placed it back again? I haven&#039;t read &#039;&#039;Heresy&#039;&#039;, but this doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense to me :s {{User:Crookandcharlatan/sig}} 10:07, December 10, 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     Simon Hathaway just speculates that it was removed from the Temple for unexplained reasons and buried where it was then found by Jeanne. Then whoever recovered it after she lost it returned it to the Temple. [[Special:Contributions/12.25.9.2|12.25.9.2]] 11:40, December 10, 2016 (UTC) Lacrossedeamon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>12.25.9.2</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>